Human Rights Watch, a US based human rights watch dog has urged the government of Bangladesh to stop forcibly returning of ethnic Rohingya fleeing sectarian violence back to Myanmar. The report also says that at least 18 Rohingya asylum seekers, including three young children, are in immediate danger of being forcibly returned to Burma on World Refugee Day, June 20.
Human Rights Watch urged the Bangladeshi government to provide Rohingya fleeing Burma humanitarian assistance and at least temporary refuge until it is safe for them to return home.
“Bangladesh is putting the lives of those fleeing violence – including young children – at risk by sending them back to Burma,” said Bill Frelick, refugees director at Human Rights Watch. “It is tragically ironic that Bangladesh has closed its border and is making forced returns on World Refugee Day. This is a reminder that the fundamental principles of refugee protection still need to be respected.”
Bangladesh should abide by its obligations under international law not to return Rohingya fleeing violence in Burma, Human Rights Watch said. At least 18 asylum seekers are at immediate risk of forced return and others face return in the future. This number includes a family of five, including three children, in the custody of the Bangladesh coastguard. One of the children is a newborn boy named Sangram (meaning “struggle”) who was born on or around June 13 on St Martin’s island in Bangladesh after the family was detained.
The family had reportedly fled Sittwe, capital of Arakan state in Burma. Others who arrived on the same boat have already been sent back to Burma. At least 13 others are currently believed to be in the custody of Border Guard Bangladesh.
“The Bangladesh government shouldn’t be pushing boats back at all, but it’s even more appalling that authorities are willing to send children back into territory where bloodshed continues,” said Frelick. “The government should provide those fleeing Burma temporary refuge and open its doors to humanitarian aid from abroad.”
While Bangladesh is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or its 1967 Protocol, it is a party to other treaties – including the Convention against Torture, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child – that provide protections to refugees and asylum seekers.
These treaties and customary international law establish the obligation of states to respect the principle of nonrefoulement, which holds that refugees should not be forcibly returned to a place where their lives or freedom would be threatened and that no person should be returned to a place where they would be subjected to torture.
Article 3 of the Convention against Torture prohibits the return or expulsion of any persons to states where they would be in danger of being tortured. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has stated that states must not return a child to a country where there are substantial grounds for believing that there is real risk of irreparable harm to the child.
Human Rights Watch repeated its call to the Bangladeshi government to allow independent humanitarian agencies free and unfettered access to the border areas. Other governments should provide humanitarian assistance and other support for the refugees and press the Burmese government to find a durable solution by resolving Rohingya citizenship. The Rohingya are not recognized as citizens of Burma, and have long been persecuted and discriminated against by the Burmese government.
Brutal violence in Arakan State between Buddhists and Muslims erupted on June 3 and has intensified since then. Security forces have shot and killed an unknown number of Rohingya, and sectarian mobs from both groups have burned down the homes and businesses of the other. On June 10, Burmese President Thein Sein issued a state of emergency in the area, ceding authority for law enforcement to the Burmese army.
For decades, the Rohingya have routinely suffered abuses by Burmese security forces, including extrajudicial killings, forced labor, land confiscation, and restricted freedom of movement.
Source: Human Rights Watch