Today’s` Britain’s news top topics big three credit company’s credit grading, as Britain’s three A credit rating now `negative outlook` by the Moody`s.BBC,BSKB,Channel four,TyneTees Television Channels are doing live coverage and discussing about this.
Its now hot topics in the city how the credit rating agencies work, are they are any influenced by the any political parties or any sorts of myth, what they are wants to deliver the financial sector and beyond, etc? So many questions are in mind and peoples are thinking, is there any political stunt or peoples mind trying to diverting the other way from the focus of economic crisis or from cut deficits? Any effect down grading or upgrading or over all good rating should any effect for the society or people’s daily life because of peoples are really suffering for cut deficits and fearing loosing their jobs.
As general peoples are quiet understand that bank, finance company always rely in credit reference agencies before lending or taking decision they normally consult with credit reference agencies whether lending or not. Credit reference agencies don’t have take any parts of decision making about lending but they only provide up to the dated information’s regarding the clients financial history, nothing else. On the basis of credit reference agencies information’s lenders taking their own decision with their own policies. But AAA Credit Rating Agencies? It’s totally different from the consumer’s credit reference agencies like Experian and Equifax. This three big credit rating agencies are dealings with nations and international over all economic situation and after consulting and having available all factual data,informations for borrowers and investors and issuers, and they will issues simple letter where stated nations credit rating situation. Nations to nations their credit ratings obviously varied available information’s and this will be hugely effect in the country’s economy as well as borrowing capability from the world financial market and investor as well.
Moodys`, Flitch Ratings, Standard & Spoors are the three major credit rating companies.
MOODY`S: - Moody’s` founded in 1909.It has office in Central London, Uk.There are 4,300 professionals employees working in this company. Moody’s` has 27 worldwide offices, headquarters in Newyork, USA. So far in 2010 company’s revenue was £396 million.Moodys` recently downgraded countries are Hungary, Slovenia, Italy, Portugal, Spain and today’s news focused in UK`s credit rating stated as`Negative Out Look`.
FLITCH RATINGS: - This credit rating company was founded in 1913.It have 2,000 professionals throughout their 51 worldwide offices. Flitch ratings has dual headquarter, one is in New York, USA and other one in London, UK. Last 2010 it has revenues £415 million sterling. Recently downgraded countries like Italy, Spain, Belgium and Cyprus.
STANDARD & SPOORS: - This was founded in 1860, have 7,500 professionals in 21 worldwide offices. Their headquarters is in New York, USA. 2010 earned revenue £1.83 billion including McGraw-Hill Financial. Recently downgraded countries are France, Austria and Belize.
Following the very recent down grading of the French, Italy, Portugal, Spain and other countries by the big credit rating company named Standard & Spoor’s, and now in Britain credit rating is `negative out look` by the another credit rating company named Moody, it has been in influence and very tense focusing in the current world over all economy growth and rating by the credit rating agencies.
We already understood about the AAA and the `big three`-like Standard & Spoors`,Moody,Fitch Ratings-any one us sure what they are doing or can their ratings by any fairly or have any accountability by the Finance Watch dog, whatsoever?
So far we got the information from the Moody’s website and thereafter later through Mr. Daniel Piels,head of EMEA media relations at Moody’s that ``Credit ratings are opinions on the likelihood that a borrower will repay a given debt over a medium-term time horizon”. He added, `` Debt can be issued by the corporates, banks, municipalities or sovereigns. That means potential lenders need to have a view on whether borrowers have the capacity to pay back a debt on time. Our ratings help bridge the information gap between a borrower and a lender``. (Source news focus on 9th feb.12, metro, bbcuk).
Credit rating agencies just play a beneficial role through providing the right information between the clients and borrowers, discussed risk factors, and not playing any role about decision making whether lenders issue loan or credit to their clients or borrowers. Their information’s about credit worthiness are acqurate, correct and up to the dated according to they are claimed in their site.
Mr. Piels added more that``It`s important to note that they are just one among a rating of tools to inform the markets` discussion on credit risk, though``.
In the context of microeconomic market analysis and research need to be much developed because of recent big three’s credit rating down grading of the big growth economic nations includes US Government. Because macroeconomic context we see the different scenarios that may emerge and information’s they achieved directly from the issuers or lenders. Publish a credit rating on a scale of letters only by the agencies, its never ever evaluate or analysis by the third parties or financial authorities, which those don’t have any access or have not any scope to do input any information’s or analysis their opinion on their tools which they have stored.
Although Moody’s credit rating always monitoring and forward looking, which will change reflect the evolving nature of the credit environment, said Mr. Piels. But its not clear whether this monitoring by the any independent accountable bodies or beyond, should understood it has been monitored by their own inner organizations follows by their policies.
So` as credit risk increases, our rating will change accordingly. Ratings may also change as result of refinements we make to our methodologies, which are transparent, publicly available on our website and from the basis of our ratings, he added.
Today’s debt market becoming more regulatory as issuers need ratings to keep their interest costs down to attract investors, so that investors need the ratings to help them decide to lend.
But information’s should be made available for everyone, not in closed door relationship.
As we see whole credit worthiness or market is in under controlled by the three so called big credit rating agencies which they only represent a small group. Its has so many potential focus in market regulatory and economies but negative impacts concern growing as well, like investment fearness, overall grade on focus, huge influence over policy without any democratic accountability.
There has potential conflict between interests and exist, with over every business model. With this three credit rating company’s also role a potential monopoly in the market economy, which have dramatic effects in the financial crisis as well?
On the contrary of risk economic environment big three should also have the factor of evolving credit crisis, which should be evaluate and analysis by the independent watch dog.
I am not differing their rating but this should be done by the democratic way and must have democratic accountability.
Whether policy or rating process should go through democrating consultation way and implementations may have the right to made for publicly open as published.
Because in the context of current free economy market, no one has playing role or made game with monopoly, entire stake holders,developers,investors,financial institutions has the full equal right to play the role with highest competition in to the market economy environment. All other statutory agencies includes banks, finance, insurance, parliament, etc every institutions should responsible and accountable for their work, whether government, non-government, or as privately owned, or as PPI investment in terms of their business and culture, to their authority or auditors. But the consequences about big three agencies has not any accountability like others has democratic way done by the laws and legislation. Central Bank or Central Bureau of agencies could not touch them even they are not exercise any consultation with the central bank before input data in to their system or stored or before published rating with their rating letter to the country or in hands to the company. The question is where they are rightly accountable about the Credit Ratings? Simple answered still consequences. This should be done further in depth research for the sake of right, acqurate, concrete, impartial job to be done by them, especially in current conflict economic situation.
Currently UK`s government are facing lowest ever inflation, jobless peoples more than three million since three years. Euro-Zone are facing real crisis since established Euro, continues euros’ are fallen, adding more countries bad debt in every fiscal year. It is quiet understood about the risk factors of debt and every stakeholder are in risk. But it doesn’t mean that big three has the right to do monopoly with any proper accountability.
REFORM PROPOSAL:-As I have the information from Finance Watch, where the reforms proposal underway.``As part of the suggested reforms to credit ratings agencies, Finance Watch is keen to abandon the idea of a letter-based ratings system. The European Commission wants to reduce the reliance of market participants on CRAs.Finance Watch proposal for achieving this is to delete all references to ratings from regulations, making it difficult for investors to use ratings in their internal rules. The highly emotive letter-based ratings system would be replaced with a simple, boring number that reflects the probability of default (which is the only thing that investors need to know anyway).The old AAA system should be thrown away completely``. (Source from Mr. Ford explained, CRAs, 9th feb.12).
Sources: BSKB live coverage on 14th February 2012
BBC led news analysis on 14th February 2012
Big three credit rating agencies website, 2012.
Haley Leavers analysis publications on 9th February 2012.
BDST: 1925 HRS, FEB 16, 2012
All rights reserved. Sale, redistribution or reproduction of information/photos/illustrations/video/audio contents on this website in any form without prior permission from banglanews24.com are strictly prohibited and liable to legal action.